1. Home
  2. »
  3. Spousal Support
  4. »


by | May 2, 2011 | Alimony, Divorce, Spousal Maintenance, Spousal Support

Not long ago, the notion of a wife being ordered to pay spousal maintenance (alimony) to her husband in a divorce case would have been laughed at.  Men paid alimony, not women.  But that was then, and this is now. Things are changing fast.
Throughout most of our country’s history, opportunities for women were limited. No matter how bright, talented, or motivated they might be, women were allowed only one socially acceptable career path – motherhood. Society was rife with prejudice against women, and barriers were firmly established everywhere — in education, in the business world, and in the social structure – to keep them in their place. With these massive societal obstacles, it took almost a superhuman effort for any woman to obtain an education and forge a successful career. Most women in the 1950’s and ’60s were stay-at-home mothers, and not always by choice. If a woman wanted to work, she was likely to be offered a low-paying job, at best. Not many careers were open to women. They could become a nurse, a teacher, or a secretary – but a career as a doctor, a school principal, or a business executive was almost unattainable, regardless of the woman’s intelligence, experience, or qualifications. A “glass ceiling” was erected and any individual woman who tried to break through it did so at her own peril – she was likely to get sliced to pieces in the effort.
The concept of alimony grew out of a society in which men had the freedom to work and women were bereft of opportunities. When a divorce occurred, it was common that the wife found herself with little education, training, or work experience, and no means of providing for herself financially. Without spousal support, a divorced woman could fall from a high standard of living to a life of abject poverty – and many did. Laws providing for spousal support (referred to as alimony or spousal maintenance) were enacted to help soften the blow. The purpose of the law was to give a spouse sufficient time in which to obtain the education, training, or work experience necessary to be able to adequately support herself. In rare instances, a spouse was awarded “lifetime” support, but this was usually limited to cases in which there was a long-term marriage, an unusually high standard of living, and/or a disability.  
Until fairly recently, the concept of a man being awarded spousal maintenance was almost unheard of — but society is changing, and so are our laws.
Arizona’s spousal maintenance statute can be found at A.R.S., Section 25-319. It is purposefully worded in a manner that is gender-neutral, stating:
“In a proceeding for dissolution of marriage or legal separation . . . the court may grant a maintenance order for either spouse . . . “
While the “glass ceiling” hasn’t been completely shattered, it is coming down quickly. Women have made great strides in business, education, politics, sports, and the social structure at large.  In fact, in 2010 more than 57% percent of college students in the U.S. were women. This means that the economic and political clout of women is growing and will continue to grow. Equality for women in every facet of our American society is now a foregone conclusion. (If you are the parent of a daughter — or a son — you should welcome this change.)
In 2011 it is not uncommon for a wife to be earning as much, or more than, her husband. It is not strange anymore to see a “stay-at-home father” taking care of the children while his wife goes off to work to support the family. And, as a result, it is no longer unheard of for the Court to order a wife to pay alimony to her husband following a divorce.
A.R.S. 25-319 provides a list of factors that the Court is required to consider in determining the amount and duration of spousal maintenance. Some of those factors are:
  1. The length of the marriage;
  2. The family’s standard of living during the marriage;
  3. The comparative financial resources of the spouses, including their earning abilities in the labor market;
  4. The contribution of the spouse seeking support to the earning ability of the other spouse;
  5. The extent to which the spouse seeking support has reduced his or her income or career opportunities for the benefit of the other spouse;
  6. The age of the spouse seeking support;
  7. The physical and emotional condition of the spouse seeking support;
  8. Whether a spouse lacks sufficient resources to provide for his/her reasonable needs;
  9. Whether the spouse seeking support is able to be self-sufficient or lacks the earning ability to be self-sufficient;
  10. The time necessary to acquire sufficient education or training to enable the spouse seeking support to find appropriate employment, and whether such education or training is readily available.
There was a time in which one could expect the “spouse seeking support” to almost always be the wife. That era is coming to a close. Society is becoming more fair, balanced, and equal. That’s a good thing. 
In the future, when two parties divorce and the spouse in need of support happens to be a man, then spousal maintenance will be awarded to him. And that’s a good thing, too.
Gary Frank has handled Spousal Maintenance issues, for both women and men, in Family Law cases for over thirty years. He is well acquainted with complex issues in divorce cases, having dealt with them as a litigation attorney, a mediator, and a judge pro tem in the Maricopa County Superior Court. If you are in need of a consultation regarding the issue of spousal maintenance, or any other Family Law matter, please give us a call at 602-922-9989, or contact us through our website. We would be happy to talk to you.

Let's Discuss Your Case - We're Here For You.

When dealing with a family matter issue, you do not have to go at it alone. Schedule your comprehensive attorney consultation now and we can discuss the entire case.

Let's Discuss Your Case - We're Here For You.

When dealing with a family matter issue, you do not have to go at it alone. Give us a call and we can discuss the entire case during a comprehensive attorney consultation.

Client Reviews

Very honest

November 2009 I retained Mr. Frank almost two years to represent me in a visitation modification filed by my ex-husband. Mr. Frank quickly and efficiently became familiar with my case and was very honest about all the potential results that could occur. I truly feel that Mr. Frank had my children’s best interests in mind…

– Judy K